Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PAMCX
CCSGX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PAMCX
CCSGX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. CCSGX (483M). CCSGX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). PAMCX (1.02) and CCSGX (0.99) have similar cost to investors . PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSGX (11.00). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PAMCX (2500) vs CCSGX (250000). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.95 vs. CCSGX (-10.05). CCSGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.56 vs. PAMCX (-18.38).
| CCSGX | PAMCX | CCSGX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.02 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.02 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | 2.296 | -273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 23.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | 1.95 | -516% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.31 | 2.08 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.56 | -18.38 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 26.84 | 535% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement