Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PAMCX
CCSGX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PAMCX
CCSGX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. CCSGX (454M). CCSGX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CCSGX (12 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). PAMCX (1.02) and CCSGX (0.99) have similar cost to investors . PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSGX (11.00). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PAMCX (2500) vs CCSGX (250000). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.06 vs. CCSGX (-12.06). CCSGX return over 5 years is better than : -9.58 vs. PAMCX (-20.43).
| CCSGX | PAMCX | CCSGX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.02 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.02 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.894 | 3.648 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 22.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.06 | -1.06 | 1,138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.97 | -2.60 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.58 | -20.43 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.57 | 26.31 | 523% |