Ad is loading...
CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PEMGX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$27.10
Change+$0.26 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets728.07M
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a StrongBuy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.1B vs. CCSGX (728M). CCSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.10 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.45 vs. CCSGX (15.54). CCSGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. PEMGX (42.66).
| CCSGX | PEMGX | CCSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.209 | 4.036 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 728M | 30.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.54 | 19.45 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.75 | 22.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 42.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.22 | 108.06 | 185% |