Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. CCSGX (454M). CCSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSGX (12 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSGX (11.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). CCSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.06 vs. PEMGX (-13.38). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.33 vs. CCSGX (-9.58).
| CCSGX | PEMGX | CCSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.894 | -4.297 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 23.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.06 | -13.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.97 | 11.31 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.58 | -2.33 | 411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.57 | 77.19 | 178% |