Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PEMGX
CCSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 24.6B vs. CCSGX (483M). CCSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSGX (11.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). CCSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.05 vs. PEMGX (-13.27). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.25 vs. CCSGX (-5.56).
| CCSGX | PEMGX | CCSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | -6.948 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 24.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | -13.27 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.31 | 15.55 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.56 | -1.25 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 77.09 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers