Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs RPMGX
CCSGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs RPMGX
CCSGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. CCSGX (483M). CCSGX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CCSGX (11 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSGX (11.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: RPMGX (2500) vs CCSGX (250000). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.62 vs. CCSGX (-10.05). CCSGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.56 vs. RPMGX (-16.15).
| CCSGX | RPMGX | CCSGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.77 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.77 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | 2.406 | -260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 23.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | 2.62 | -384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.31 | 4.00 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.56 | -16.15 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 32.51 | 441% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers