Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs RPMGX
CCSGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs RPMGX
CCSGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. CCSGX (417M). CCSGX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CCSGX (12 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSGX (11.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: RPMGX (2500) vs CCSGX (250000). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.63 vs. CCSGX (-9.43). CCSGX return over 5 years is better than : -11.12 vs. RPMGX (-18.31).
| CCSGX | RPMGX | CCSGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.77 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.77 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.751 | 6.057 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 417M | 22.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.43 | 1.63 | -580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.16 | 5.17 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.12 | -18.31 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.15 | 31.98 | 423% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement