Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. CCSMX (658M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.47) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (12 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. CCSMX (5.88). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.91 vs. CCSMX (40.75).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.04 | 4,400% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.508 | 6.195 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 39.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 15.33 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 51.73 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 61.91 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.56 | 86.12 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement