Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$23.40
Change-$1.15 (-4.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.6M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.74
Change-$5.91 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. CCSMX (658M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.53) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSMX (9.00) and FSMAX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. FSMAX (3.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 106.28 vs. CCSMX (84.03).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.04 | 4,400% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.102 | -6.855 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 36.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 3.80 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.63 | 8.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.03 | 106.28 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.07 | 57.10 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...