Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$24.58
Change-$0.62 (-2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets659.75M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$86.92
Change-$2.39 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. CCSMX (660M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.54) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSMX (9.00) and FSMAX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. CCSMX (6.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.82 vs. CCSMX (49.91).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.04 | 4,400% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.562 | -1.728 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 660M | 36B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 8.66 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.62 | 40.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.91 | 67.82 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.82 | 67.47 | 246% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement