Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CCSMX (439M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (13 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSMX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. CCSMX (-14.43). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.29 vs. CCSMX (-15.23).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.891 | 14.324 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 43.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.43 | 19.73 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | 59.29 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | 34.29 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.05 | 134.59 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers