Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CCSMX (426M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (13 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSMX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.60 vs. CCSMX (-10.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. CCSMX (-10.61).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.079 | 19.519 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.02 | 23.60 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.00 | 70.81 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.61 | 40.00 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.79 | 140.28 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement