Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs FSMAX
CCSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CCSMX (467M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSMX (12 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSMX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.92 vs. CCSMX (-11.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. CCSMX (-11.81).
| CCSMX | FSMAX | CCSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.170 | 14.880 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 42.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.70 | 27.92 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.65 | 72.60 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.81 | 32.43 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.23 | 160.27 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers