Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PAMCX
CCSMX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PAMCX
CCSMX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PAMCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. CCSMX (426M). CCSMX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CCSMX (13 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.02). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSMX (11.00). CCSMX (2500) and PAMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.04 vs. CCSMX (-10.02). CCSMX return over 5 years is better than : -10.61 vs. PAMCX (-19.88).
| CCSMX | PAMCX | CCSMX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.02 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.02 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.079 | 7.042 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.02 | 1.04 | -966% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.00 | 1.73 | 404% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.61 | -19.88 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.79 | 27.98 | 482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement