Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PEMGX
CCSMX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PEMGX
CCSMX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.8B vs. CCSMX (439M). CCSMX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CCSMX (13 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSMX (11.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PEMGX (1000) vs CCSMX (2500). CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.43 vs. PEMGX (-17.32). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -7.28 vs. CCSMX (-15.23).
| CCSMX | PEMGX | CCSMX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.90 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.90 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.891 | -6.850 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 22.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.43 | -17.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | 7.45 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | -7.28 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.05 | 71.07 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement