Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. CCSMX (467M). CCSMX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: CCSMX (12 years) vs PMBCX (19 years). PMBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CCSMX (1.51). PMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSMX (11.00). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBCX (1000) vs CCSMX (2500). CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.70 vs. PMBCX (-15.49). CCSMX (-11.81) and PMBCX (-12.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCSMX | PMBCX | CCSMX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.71 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.71 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.170 | -6.886 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 23.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.70 | -15.49 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.65 | 8.33 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.81 | -12.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.23 | 63.25 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement