Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBCX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. CCSMX (380M). CCSMX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: CCSMX (13 years) vs PMBCX (20 years). PMBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CCSMX (1.51). PMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSMX (11.00). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBCX (1000) vs CCSMX (2500). CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.56 vs. PMBCX (-20.16). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.57 vs. CCSMX (-20.04).
| CCSMX | PMBCX | CCSMX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.71 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.71 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.758 | -7.831 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 380M | 21.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.56 | -20.16 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.66 | 4.96 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.04 | -15.57 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.73 | 49.83 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement