Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBCX
CCSMX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 22.8B vs. CCSMX (439M). CCSMX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: CCSMX (13 years) vs PMBCX (20 years). PMBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CCSMX (1.51). PMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. CCSMX (11.00). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBCX (1000) vs CCSMX (2500). CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.43 vs. PMBCX (-19.11). PMBCX (-14.71) and CCSMX (-15.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCSMX | PMBCX | CCSMX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.71 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.71 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.891 | -7.282 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 22.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.43 | -19.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | 2.25 | -70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | -14.71 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.05 | 47.86 | 268% |