Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBPX
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. CCSMX (658M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSMX (12 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX (10.50) and CCSMX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.61 vs. CCSMX (5.88). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.25 vs. CCSMX (40.75).
| CCSMX | PMBPX | CCSMX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.83 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.508 | 8.606 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 13.61 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 49.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 56.25 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.56 | 107.27 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement