Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBPX
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.73M
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.6B vs. CCSMX (642M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSMX (12 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX (10.50) and CCSMX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.43 vs. CCSMX (2.31). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 45.61 vs. CCSMX (30.98).
| CCSMX | PMBPX | CCSMX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.83 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.562 | 6.098 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 32.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 9.43 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.81 | 31.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.98 | 45.61 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.43 | 97.23 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement