Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBPX
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$24.58
Change-$0.62 (-2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets659.75M
CCSMX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBPX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.3B vs. CCSMX (660M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. CCSMX (6.46). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 67.13 vs. CCSMX (49.91).
| CCSMX | PMBPX | CCSMX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.83 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.562 | 4.441 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 660M | 31.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 10.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.62 | 45.73 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.91 | 67.13 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.82 | 94.81 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement