Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs RPMGX
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs RPMGX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$26.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets734.34M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. CCSMX (734M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: RPMGX (0.05) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CCSMX (11 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. CCSMX (9.00). CCSMX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. RPMGX (3.12). CCSMX return over 5 years is better than : 43.64 vs. RPMGX (4.05).
| CCSMX | RPMGX | CCSMX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.734 | 2.607 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 30.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | 3.12 | 529% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.30 | -3.66 | -418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.64 | 4.05 | 1,078% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.19 | 38.31 | 517% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers