Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs RPMGX
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs RPMGX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.93
Change-$0.95 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.82
Change-$3.46 (-3.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. RPMGX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. CCSMX (766M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: RPMGX (0.05) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CCSMX (11 years) vs RPMGX (32 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. CCSMX (9.00). CCSMX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. RPMGX (4.60). CCSMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.73 vs. RPMGX (9.06).
| CCSMX | RPMGX | CCSMX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.962 | 3.239 | 493% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 31.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 4.60 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | -8.96 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.73 | 9.06 | 582% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.17 | 37.01 | 519% |