Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs RPMGX
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs RPMGX
CCSMX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.1B vs. CCSMX (439M). CCSMX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CCSMX (13 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). CCSMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. CCSMX (11.00). CCSMX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.24 vs. CCSMX (-14.43). CCSMX return over 5 years is better than : -15.23 vs. RPMGX (-21.35).
| CCSMX | RPMGX | CCSMX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.77 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.77 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.891 | 1.851 | -426% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 22.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.43 | -3.24 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | -3.10 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | -21.35 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.05 | 28.35 | 452% |