Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSZX vs FIFGX
CCSZX vs FIFGX Comparison
Open Charts CCSZX vs FIFGX
CCSZX vs FIFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSZX vs. FIFGX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSZX is a Hold and FIFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIFGX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. CCSZX (500M). FIFGX pays higher dividends than CCSZX: FIFGX (4.92) vs CCSZX (2.34). CCSZX was incepted earlier than FIFGX: CCSZX (14 years) vs FIFGX (7 years). CCSZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FIFGX (0.39). CCSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. FIFGX (0.00). FIFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSZX: FIFGX (0) vs CCSZX (2000). FIFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.36 vs. CCSZX (37.42). CCSZX return over 5 years is better than : 76.74 vs. FIFGX (65.69).
| CCSZX | FIFGX | CCSZX / FIFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.39 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.39 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.012 | 40.214 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 500M | 5.92B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 4.92 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.42 | 49.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.84 | 57.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.74 | 65.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement