Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSZX vs PCRAX
CCSZX vs PCRAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSZX vs PCRAX
CCSZX vs PCRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSZX vs. PCRAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSZX is a Hold and PCRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCRAX has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. CCSZX (457M). PCRAX pays higher dividends than CCSZX: PCRAX (12.29) vs CCSZX (2.35). CCSZX was incepted earlier than PCRAX: CCSZX (14 years) vs PCRAX (24 years). PCRAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CCSZX (0.86). PCRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. CCSZX (198.00). PCRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSZX: PCRAX (1000) vs CCSZX (2000). CCSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.05 vs. PCRAX (35.04). CCSZX return over 5 years is better than : 80.88 vs. PCRAX (58.79).
| CCSZX | PCRAX | CCSZX / PCRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.30 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.38 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.555 | 25.269 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 457M | 4.42B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 12.29 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.05 | 35.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.76 | 46.10 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.88 | 58.79 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.36 | 102.95 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers