Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSZX vs PCRAX
CCSZX vs PCRAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSZX vs PCRAX
CCSZX vs PCRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSZX vs. PCRAX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSZX is a Hold and PCRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCRAX has more cash in the bank: 4.08B vs. CCSZX (430M). PCRAX pays higher dividends than CCSZX: PCRAX (13.14) vs CCSZX (2.51). CCSZX was incepted earlier than PCRAX: CCSZX (14 years) vs PCRAX (24 years). PCRAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CCSZX (0.86). PCRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 268.00 vs. CCSZX (198.00). PCRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSZX: PCRAX (1000) vs CCSZX (2000). CCSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.02 vs. PCRAX (27.26). CCSZX return over 5 years is better than : 79.51 vs. PCRAX (53.95).
| CCSZX | PCRAX | CCSZX / PCRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.30 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.38 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.340 | 21.449 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 4.08B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 13.14 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.02 | 27.26 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.85 | 40.53 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.51 | 53.95 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.52 | 98.50 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement