Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs CGFAX
CCWRX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs CGFAX
CCWRX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CCWRX (528M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: CCWRX (14 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: CGFAX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. CCWRX (7.08). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. CCWRX (-34.81).
| CCWRX | CGFAX | CCWRX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.62 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.071 | 8.708 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 11.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.81 | 48.15 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.81 | 18.99 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.07 | 122.58 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement