Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs CGFAX
CCWRX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs CGFAX
CCWRX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CCWRX (495M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: CCWRX (14 years) vs CGFAX (25 years). CCWRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: CGFAX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). CCWRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.75 vs. CGFAX (-0.03). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. CCWRX (-37.07).
| CCWRX | CGFAX | CCWRX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.62 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.383 | 9.063 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | -0.03 | -7,982% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.60 | 42.54 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.07 | 13.11 | -283% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.48 | 110.83 | -37% |