Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$10.01
Change-$0.05 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.44
Change-$0.49 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. CCWRX (669M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. CCWRX (-6.51). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. CCWRX (-41.14).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.184 | 18.319 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 669M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.51 | 12.87 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.32 | 67.12 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.14 | 33.31 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.42 | 83.37 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement