Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$9.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets706.33M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.67
Change-$0.30 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.19B
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. CCWRX (706M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (13 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. CCWRX (-11.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.36 vs. CCWRX (-34.78).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.729 | 10.838 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 706M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.08 | 7.43 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.39 | 51.39 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.78 | 35.36 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.58 | 62.65 | -81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement