Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CCWRX (502M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (14 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.85 vs. CCWRX (-3.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. CCWRX (-39.15).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.35 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.35 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.011 | 3.848 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -2.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.09 | 26.00 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.15 | 2.16 | -1,809% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.87 | 72.70 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement