Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. CCWRX (514M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (14 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). CCWRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. GFACX (1.89). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 7.32 vs. CCWRX (-35.25).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.35 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.35 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.038 | 8.722 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 1.89 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.74 | 39.45 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.25 | 7.32 | -482% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.61 | 78.07 | -53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement