Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CCWRX (495M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (14 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.82). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). CCWRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.75 vs. GFACX (-2.39). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. CCWRX (-37.07).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.35 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.35 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.383 | 8.529 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | -2.39 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.60 | 34.46 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.07 | 3.85 | -962% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.48 | 82.33 | -49% |