Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGABX
CCWRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGABX
CCWRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CCWRX (528M). CCWRX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: CCWRX (14 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGABX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. CCWRX (7.08). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. CCWRX (-34.81).
| CCWRX | RGABX | CCWRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.38 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.38 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.071 | 8.319 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 9.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.81 | 41.24 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.81 | 10.82 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.07 | 97.06 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement