Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGACX
CCWRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGACX
CCWRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CCWRX (528M). CCWRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CCWRX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. CCWRX (7.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. CCWRX (-34.81).
| CCWRX | RGACX | CCWRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.93 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.071 | 6.185 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 7.94 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.81 | 43.05 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.81 | 13.23 | -263% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.07 | 107.97 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement