Advertisement
CCXI vs IPHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCXI is a Hold and IPHA is a Hold.
| CCXI | IPHA | CCXI / IPHA | |
| Capitalization | 686M | 207M | 331% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | 6.857 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.25M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CCXI | IPHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPHA's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CCXI (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHA’s stock grew similarly to CCXI’s over the last 12 months.
IPHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CCXI (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHA’s stock grew similarly to CCXI’s over the last 12 months.
IPHA's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CCXI (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHA’s stock grew similarly to CCXI’s over the last 12 months.
CCXI's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as IPHA (56) in the null industry. This means that CCXI’s stock grew similarly to IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
CCXI's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as IPHA (27) in the null industry. This means that CCXI’s stock grew similarly to IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
| CCXI | IPHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | about 1 month ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCXI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while IPHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCXI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IPHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCXI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCXI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IPHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCXI (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -8.06% price change this week, while IPHA (@Biotechnology) price change was -10.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -6.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2531.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPHA is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.08% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Biotechnology (-6.09% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
CCXI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCXI has been loosely correlated with SPRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCXI jumps, then SPRO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCXI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCXI | 100% | -3.83% | ||
| SPRO - CCXI | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| ABOS - CCXI | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| ANVS - CCXI | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.88% | ||
| IPHA - CCXI | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| IDYA - CCXI | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
IPHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHA has been loosely correlated with MDGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPHA jumps, then MDGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPHA | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| MDGL - IPHA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| APLM - IPHA | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.62% | ||
| FENC - IPHA | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| CCXI - IPHA | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.83% | ||
| COGT - IPHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||