CDE
Price
$6.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.49B
28 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$5.48
Change
-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDE vs HL

Header iconCDE vs HL Comparison
Open Charts CDE vs HLBanner chart's image
Coeur Mining
Price$6.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Volume$47.88K
Capitalization1.49B
Hecla Mining
Price$5.48
Change-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Volume$106.83K
Capitalization3.01B
CDE vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDE vs. HL commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDE is a Hold and HL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CDE: $6.37 vs. HL: $5.58)
Brand notoriety: CDE: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDE: 122% vs. HL: 203%
Market capitalization -- CDE: $1.49B vs. HL: $3.01B
CDE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.49B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than CDE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDE is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDE is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than CDE($1.49B). HL has higher P/E ratio than CDE: HL (1111.11) vs CDE (20.66). HL YTD gains are higher at: 13.646 vs. CDE (11.364). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. CDE (57.8M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. CDE (61.6M). CDE has less debt than HL: CDE (555M) vs HL (663M). CDE has higher revenues than HL: CDE (821M) vs HL (720M).
CDEHLCDE / HL
Capitalization1.49B3.01B49%
EBITDA57.8M124M47%
Gain YTD11.36413.64683%
P/E Ratio20.661111.112%
Revenue821M720M114%
Total Cash61.6M106M58%
Total Debt555M663M84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDE vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
CDE
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDE's Valuation (73) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (97). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (100). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (90). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (55). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDE (99). This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDEHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPYAX8.280.15
+1.85%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq A
RRRRX22.050.35
+1.61%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl
LCBDX25.890.33
+1.29%
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income IS
DOXGX270.103.38
+1.27%
Dodge & Cox Stock X
FDESX37.490.44
+1.19%
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock O

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
+3.07%
HL - CDE
83%
Closely correlated
+3.72%
PAAS - CDE
79%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
MAG - CDE
78%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
AG - CDE
77%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
AEM - CDE
75%
Closely correlated
+4.20%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+3.72%
PAAS - HL
85%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
MAG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
AG - HL
80%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
More