Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs FSGEX
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs FSGEX
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
Price$35.83
Change+$0.55 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$17.59
Change+$0.27 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.93B
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. FSGEX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Buy and FSGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 55.9B vs. CDHAX (1.23B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than CDHAX: FSGEX (2.54) vs CDHAX (2.27). CDHAX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: CDHAX (10 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). CDHAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDHAX: FSGEX (0) vs CDHAX (5000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.55 vs. CDHAX (16.04). CDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.66 vs. FSGEX (55.79).
| CDHAX | FSGEX | CDHAX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.01 | 5,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.655 | 22.144 | 98% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 55.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 2.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 17.55 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.12 | 50.33 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.66 | 55.79 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement