Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs FSGEX
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs FSGEX
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Hold and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. CDHAX (1.62B). CDHAX (2.69) and FSGEX (2.63) have matching dividends . CDHAX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: CDHAX (11 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). CDHAX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDHAX: FSGEX (0) vs CDHAX (5000). CDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.64 vs. FSGEX (28.06). CDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.58 vs. FSGEX (53.66).
| CDHAX | FSGEX | CDHAX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.01 | 5,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.01 | 6,300% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.676 | 14.153 | 132% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 74.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 2.63 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.64 | 28.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.94 | 64.20 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.58 | 53.66 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.31 | 137.49 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement