Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDIRX vs RMEBX
CDIRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDIRX vs RMEBX
CDIRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDIRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDIRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CDIRX (48.1B). CDIRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDIRX (1.09) vs RMEBX (1.04). CDIRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDIRX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CDIRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDIRX (16.00). CDIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CDIRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). CDIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. RMEBX (9.16). CDIRX return over 5 years is better than : 42.89 vs. RMEBX (33.79).
| CDIRX | RMEBX | CDIRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.697 | 6.885 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 117B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 9.16 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.50 | 33.97 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.89 | 33.79 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.42 | 92.81 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement