Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDIRX vs RMFCX
CDIRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDIRX vs RMFCX
CDIRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDIRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDIRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CDIRX (49.1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CDIRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CDIRX (1.01). CDIRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDIRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CDIRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDIRX (16.00). CDIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CDIRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). CDIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RMFCX (9.14). CDIRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.85 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| CDIRX | RMFCX | CDIRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.409 | 10.454 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.1B | 118B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.15 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 9.14 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 38.82 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.85 | 36.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.32 | 92.27 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers