CDLR
Price
$21.01
Change
-$0.07 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.82B
64 days until earnings call
MTZ
Price
$191.84
Change
-$1.41 (-0.73%)
Updated
Sep 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.25B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDLR vs MTZ

Header iconCDLR vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts CDLR vs MTZBanner chart's image
Cadeler A/S American Depositary Share (each representing four (4)
Price$21.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.33%)
Volume$15.33K
Capitalization1.82B
MasTec
Price$191.84
Change-$1.41 (-0.73%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization15.25B
CDLR vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDLR vs. MTZ commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDLR is a Buy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CDLR: $21.01 vs. MTZ: $191.96)
Brand notoriety: CDLR: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDLR: 37% vs. MTZ: 74%
Market capitalization -- CDLR: $1.82B vs. MTZ: $15.25B
CDLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $1.82B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $15.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDLR is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDLR is a better buy in the short-term than MTZ.

Price Growth

CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +296.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.06% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($15.2B) has a higher market cap than CDLR($1.82B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than CDLR: MTZ (57.13) vs CDLR (6.69). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 41.002 vs. CDLR (-5.911). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 978M vs. CDLR (318M). MTZ has more cash in the bank: 191M vs. CDLR (53M). CDLR has less debt than MTZ: CDLR (1.21B) vs MTZ (2.67B). MTZ has higher revenues than CDLR: MTZ (13B) vs CDLR (465M).
CDLRMTZCDLR / MTZ
Capitalization1.82B15.2B12%
EBITDA318M978M33%
Gain YTD-5.91141.002-14%
P/E Ratio6.6957.1312%
Revenue465M13B4%
Total Cash53M191M28%
Total Debt1.21B2.67B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDLRMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAINX22.45N/A
N/A
Dunham International Stock A
LCEYX19.68N/A
N/A
Invesco Diversified Dividend Y
MXMGX38.24N/A
N/A
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Inv
AWSSX17.99N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Core Equity R6
GAORX22.52N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Global Allocation R5

CDLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDLR and MTZ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDLR and MTZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDLR
1D Price
Change %
CDLR100%
-0.33%
MTZ - CDLR
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
AMRC - CDLR
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
ACM - CDLR
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
SHIM - CDLR
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
PWR - CDLR
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-0.67%
PWR - MTZ
84%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
EME - MTZ
83%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
FIX - MTZ
81%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
STRL - MTZ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
PRIM - MTZ
77%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
More