It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.87%.
CDLR is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
CDLR | MTZ | CDLR / MTZ | |
Capitalization | 1.73B | 12.3B | 14% |
EBITDA | 61M | 960M | 6% |
Gain YTD | -14.107 | 14.103 | -100% |
P/E Ratio | 16.42 | 57.11 | 29% |
Revenue | 180M | 12.5B | 1% |
Total Cash | 91.9M | 346M | 27% |
Total Debt | 590M | 2.63B | 22% |
MTZ | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDLR | MTZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 3 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago61% | 9 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago63% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FSIG | 18.90 | -0.05 | -0.25% |
First Trust Ltd Drtn Inv Grd Corp ETF | |||
IBLC | 33.08 | -0.28 | -0.83% |
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | |||
QLV | 66.47 | -0.79 | -1.18% |
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF | |||
VYM | 127.75 | -2.35 | -1.81% |
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | |||
AVSU | 64.96 | -1.26 | -1.90% |
Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDLR has been loosely correlated with DY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDLR jumps, then DY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CDLR | 100% | -5.00% | ||
DY - CDLR | 34% Loosely correlated | +15.76% | ||
ACA - CDLR | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
TPC - CDLR | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
PWR - CDLR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
MTZ - CDLR | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ | 100% | -1.83% | ||
EME - MTZ | 86% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
FIX - MTZ | 84% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
PWR - MTZ | 84% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
PRIM - MTZ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
STRL - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.72% | ||
More |