CDNAF vs LESL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LESL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLESL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LESL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LESL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LESL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while LESL (@Specialty Stores) price change was -11.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
LESL is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-2.81% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CDNAF | LESL | CDNAF / LESL | |
| Capitalization | 8B | 1.2B | 667% |
| EBITDA | 2.22B | 127M | 1,747% |
| Gain YTD | 0.833 | -68.741 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.22 | 59.50 | 21% |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 1.43B | 1,238% |
| Total Cash | 489M | 8.39M | 5,826% |
| Total Debt | 8.38B | 1.06B | 791% |
CDNAF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CDNAF | LESL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 59% | 15 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 69% |
CDNAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNAF | 100% | +1.61% | ||
| PAG - CDNAF | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| SAH - CDNAF | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| AN - CDNAF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| KMX - CDNAF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| LAD - CDNAF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
LESL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LESL has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LESL jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LESL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LESL | 100% | +4.85% | ||
| HNST - LESL | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.71% | ||
| CPRT - LESL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| FND - LESL | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| PAG - LESL | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CDNAF - LESL | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||