CDNAF
Price
$128.67
Change
+$0.33 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
8B
LESL
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.07 (-8.75%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs LESL

Header iconCDNAF vs LESL Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs LESLBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$128.67
Change+$0.33 (+0.26%)
Volume$14.78K
Capitalization8B
Leslie's
Price$0.73
Change-$0.07 (-8.75%)
Volume$1.84M
Capitalization1.2B
CDNAF vs LESL Comparison Chart
Loading...
LESL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. LESL commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LESL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $128.67 vs. LESL: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and LESL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 2% vs. LESL: 65%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $8B vs. LESL: $1.2B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8B. LESL’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLESL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LESL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the long-term than LESL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LESL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LESL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while LESL (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

LESL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.37% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than LESL($1.2B). LESL has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: LESL (59.50) vs CDNAF (12.22). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 22.660 vs. LESL (-67.368). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. LESL (127M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. LESL (8.39M). LESL has less debt than CDNAF: LESL (1.06B) vs CDNAF (8.38B). CDNAF has higher revenues than LESL: CDNAF (17.7B) vs LESL (1.43B).
CDNAFLESLCDNAF / LESL
Capitalization8B1.2B667%
EBITDA2.22B127M1,747%
Gain YTD22.660-67.368-34%
P/E Ratio12.2259.5021%
Revenue17.7B1.43B1,238%
Total Cash489M8.39M5,826%
Total Debt8.38B1.06B791%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LESL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LESL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEMAX23.43N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq A
QRSVX39.98N/A
N/A
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Inv
BRSYX13.80N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R6
TROIX14.48N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock I
MOJCX14.09N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Momentum C

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.26%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More

LESL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LESL has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LESL jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LESL
1D Price
Change %
LESL100%
-8.49%
HNST - LESL
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
CPRT - LESL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CDNAF - LESL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
LOW - LESL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
WINA - LESL
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More