LE
Price
$11.36
Change
+$0.15 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
349.22M
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LESL
Price
$10.09
Change
+$0.85 (+9.20%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.41M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LE vs LESL

LE vs LESL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LE vs. LESL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LE is a StrongBuy and LESL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LE: $11.21 vs. LESL: $9.28)
Brand notoriety: LE and LESL are both not notable
LE represents the Apparel/Footwear Retail, while LESL is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LE: 90% vs. LESL: 15%
Market capitalization -- LE: $344.61M vs. LESL: $86.86M
LE [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $344.61M. LESL’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $86.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $181.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $10.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLESL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LESL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LESL is a better buy in the long-term than LE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LESL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LESL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LE is a better buy in the short-term than LESL.

Price Growth

LE (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -9.08% price change this week, while LESL (@Specialty Stores) price change was +29.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

LE is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

LESL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+0.35% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

@Specialty Stores (-1.60% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LE($349M) has a higher market cap than LESL($93.4M). LESL has higher P/E ratio than LE: LESL (175.50) vs LE (1.02). LESL YTD gains are higher at: 462.424 vs. LE (-22.796). LE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.6M vs. LESL (-155.85M). LE (17.7M) and LESL (16.9M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LE has less debt than LESL: LE (246M) vs LESL (1.09B). LE has higher revenues than LESL: LE (1.34B) vs LESL (1.22B).
LELESLLE / LESL
Capitalization349M93.4M374%
EBITDA74.6M-155.85M-48%
Gain YTD-22.796462.424-5%
P/E Ratio1.02175.501%
Revenue1.34B1.22B109%
Total Cash17.7M16.9M105%
Total Debt246M1.09B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LE: Fundamental Ratings
LE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LELESL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LESL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAAGX82.930.58
+0.70%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
VGIIX100.26N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value I
IARCX17.65N/A
N/A
Invesco Real Estate C
TVOAX49.00N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Value A
BIDEX13.09N/A
N/A
BlackRock Defensive Advantage EM Instl

LE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LE has been loosely correlated with CAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LE jumps, then CAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LE
1D Price
Change %
LE100%
-9.89%
CAL - LE
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
ASO - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
WSM - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
SPWH - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
-7.66%
SBH - LE
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.93%
More

LESL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LESL has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LESL jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LESL
1D Price
Change %
LESL100%
+1.20%
HNST - LESL
53%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
CPRT - LESL
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
LE - LESL
35%
Loosely correlated
-9.89%
FND - LESL
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
HVT - LESL
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More