CDNS
Price
$305.61
Change
-$2.35 (-0.76%)
Updated
May 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.08B
80 days until earnings call
TMSNY
Price
$73.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Ad is loading...

CDNS vs TMSNY

Header iconCDNS vs TMSNY Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs TMSNYBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$305.61
Change-$2.35 (-0.76%)
Volume$11.02K
Capitalization85.08B
Temenos AG
Price$73.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization6.18B
CDNS vs TMSNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. TMSNY commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a StrongBuy and TMSNY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNS: $307.96 vs. TMSNY: $73.66)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and TMSNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 69% vs. TMSNY: 81%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $85.08B vs. TMSNY: $6.18B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $85.08B. TMSNY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than TMSNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMSNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMSNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the short-term than TMSNY.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while TMSNY (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

TMSNY is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.59% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($85.1B) has a higher market cap than TMSNY($6.18B). CDNS has higher P/E ratio than TMSNY: CDNS (81.70) vs TMSNY (52.36). TMSNY YTD gains are higher at: 5.244 vs. CDNS (2.496). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.46B vs. TMSNY (311M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. TMSNY (112M). CDNS has less debt than TMSNY: CDNS (764M) vs TMSNY (841M). CDNS has higher revenues than TMSNY: CDNS (4.09B) vs TMSNY (955M).
CDNSTMSNYCDNS / TMSNY
Capitalization85.1B6.18B1,378%
EBITDA1.46B311M471%
Gain YTD2.4965.24448%
P/E Ratio81.7052.36156%
Revenue4.09B955M428%
Total Cash1.14B112M1,017%
Total Debt764M841M91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs TMSNY: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
TMSNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
3739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4256
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMSNY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNS (85) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMSNY (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TMSNY (39) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMSNY (53) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TMSNY (56) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSTMSNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRNGF1.030.02
+2.49%
Journey Energy Inc.
DHLGY42.170.48
+1.15%
Deutsche Post AG
CJPRY10.65-0.25
-2.29%
Central Japan Railway Co.
UUGRY29.18-0.92
-3.05%
United Utilities Group PLC
PKKFF0.02N/A
-18.01%
TENET FINTECH GROUP INC.

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-0.12%
SNPS - CDNS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
ANSS - CDNS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
ORCL - CDNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
MSFT - CDNS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
PDFS - CDNS
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
More

TMSNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMSNY has been loosely correlated with TMNSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMSNY jumps, then TMNSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMSNY
1D Price
Change %
TMSNY100%
-0.00%
TMNSF - TMSNY
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSLY - TMSNY
39%
Loosely correlated
+26.37%
PMCUF - TMSNY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGYS - TMSNY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNS - TMSNY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More