Advertisement
CDNTF vs VRM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNTF is a Hold and VRM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
- VRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRM (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+2.75% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+2.87% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CDNTF | VRM | CDNTF / VRM | |
| Capitalization | 6.86B | 147M | 4,665% |
| EBITDA | 2.03B | -15.09M | -13,447% |
| Gain YTD | 40.874 | 463.872 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.24 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 16.7B | 11.6M | 143,966% |
| Total Cash | 1.19B | 14.3M | 8,322% |
| Total Debt | 7.62B | 779M | 978% |
CDNTF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CDNTF | VRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
CDNTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNTF has been loosely correlated with MTPTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNTF jumps, then MTPTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTPTF - CDNTF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MTAGF - CDNTF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANCTF - CDNTF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CMEIF - CDNTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VRM - CDNTF | -2% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
VRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRM | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| HNST - VRM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CPRT - VRM | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CVNA - VRM | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
| LE - VRM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| LOW - VRM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||