Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOAX vs FWWMX
CDOAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CDOAX vs FWWMX
CDOAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CDOAX (2.62B). CDOAX pays higher dividends than FWWMX: CDOAX (2.30) vs FWWMX (1.41). CDOAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CDOAX (2 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CDOAX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CDOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). CDOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: CDOAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). CDOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.16 vs. FWWMX (6.72).
| CDOAX | FWWMX | CDOAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.31 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.31 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.248 | 6.453 | 298% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.41 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.16 | 6.72 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 31.76 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.28 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers