Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$48.43
Change-$0.16 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.86M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CDOFX (326M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.20) vs CDOFX (1.11). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. CDOFX (-0.87). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.30 vs. CDOFX (45.60).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.178 | 6.425 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | 9.72 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.30 | 38.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.60 | 67.30 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.70 | 132.42 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement