Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$44.98
Change-$1.01 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.69M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. CDOFX (311M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.35) vs CDOFX (1.22). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. CDOFX (1.81). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.86 vs. CDOFX (43.96).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.547 | -2.825 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 311M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.35 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 6.92 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.07 | 33.42 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.96 | 65.86 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.51 | 96.04 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement