Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.63
Change-$0.43 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.3M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. CDOFX (319M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.25) vs CDOFX (1.16). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. CDOFX (1.09). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.12 vs. CDOFX (37.60).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.063 | 2.876 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.25 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 9.55 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.83 | 20.84 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.60 | 58.12 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.09 | 113.38 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers