Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.94M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.19
Change+$0.83 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. CDOFX (331M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.22) vs CDOFX (1.07). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.45 vs. CDOFX (-9.42). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. CDOFX (22.82).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.17 | 671% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.678 | 6.491 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.22 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.42 | -1.45 | 650% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.54 | 32.89 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.82 | 40.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.38 | 126.88 | 41% |