Ad is loading...
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$44.71
Change+$0.84 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.3M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. CDOFX (301M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.43) vs CDOFX (1.27). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. CDOFX (-4.10). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. CDOFX (43.38).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.994 | -8.414 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.43 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.10 | -0.09 | 4,503% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.14 | 20.27 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.38 | 65.08 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.81 | 87.81 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers