Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$49.40
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.87M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CDOFX (329M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.20) vs CDOFX (1.11). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. CDOFX (4.72). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.86 vs. CDOFX (47.12).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.239 | 6.494 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 15.39 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 32.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.12 | 67.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.28 | 133.34 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers