Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOZX vs RMEBX
CDOZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDOZX vs RMEBX
CDOZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CDOZX (2.56B). CDOZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDOZX (2.34) vs RMEBX (0.99). CDOZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDOZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDOZX (0.78). CDOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDOZX (2000). CDOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.89 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX (36.13) and CDOZX (35.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDOZX | RMEBX | CDOZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.491 | 9.416 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 0.99 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.89 | 8.96 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.34 | 32.63 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.63 | 36.13 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.86 | 90.64 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers