CDTG
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.04 (-5.41%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
GFL
Price
$50.46
Change
+$0.74 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.81B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDTG vs GFL

Header iconCDTG vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CDTG vs GFLBanner chart's image
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings
Price$0.70
Change-$0.04 (-5.41%)
Volume$6.05K
CapitalizationN/A
GFL Environmental
Price$50.46
Change+$0.74 (+1.49%)
Volume$6.3K
Capitalization12.81B
CDTG vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDTG vs. GFL commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDTG is a Hold and GFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CDTG: $0.74 vs. GFL: $49.72)
Brand notoriety: CDTG and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDTG: 38% vs. GFL: 198%
Market capitalization -- CDTG: $0 vs. GFL: $12.81B
CDTG [@Environmental Services] is valued at $0. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than CDTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDTG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDTG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDTG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CDTG (@Environmental Services) experienced а -11.90% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDTG is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

GFL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.32% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL YTD gains are higher at: 11.701 vs. CDTG (-83.371).
CDTGGFLCDTG / GFL
CapitalizationN/A12.8B-
EBITDAN/A2.22B-
Gain YTD-83.37111.701-713%
P/E RatioN/A359.45-
RevenueN/A7.52B-
Total CashN/A136M-
Total DebtN/A9.29B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDTGGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNN30.220.32
+1.07%
Smith & Nephew plc
SPRC0.31N/A
+0.72%
SciSparc Ltd
PSEC3.14N/A
N/A
Prospect Capital Corp
TOP1.23N/A
N/A
TOP Financial Group Limited
KROS13.49-0.02
-0.15%
Keros Therapeutics

CDTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTG and GFL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTG and GFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDTG
1D Price
Change %
CDTG100%
-1.20%
GFL - CDTG
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
LNZA - CDTG
8%
Poorly correlated
-19.25%
QRHC - CDTG
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
WCN - CDTG
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
AQMS - CDTG
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-1.70%
WCN - GFL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
RSG - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CWST - GFL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
WM - GFL
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
CLH - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More