CDTG
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFL
Price
$46.51
Change
+$0.99 (+2.17%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.7B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDTG vs GFL

Header iconCDTG vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CDTG vs GFLBanner chart's image
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings
Price$0.46
Change-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Volume$400
Capitalization4.87M
GFL Environmental
Price$46.51
Change+$0.99 (+2.17%)
Volume$11.99K
Capitalization16.7B
CDTG vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
CDTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDTG vs. GFL commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDTG is a Hold and GFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CDTG: $0.47 vs. GFL: $46.51)
Brand notoriety: CDTG and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDTG: 152% vs. GFL: 80%
Market capitalization -- CDTG: $4.87M vs. GFL: $16.7B
CDTG [@Environmental Services] is valued at $4.87M. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $16.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $86.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDTG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than CDTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDTG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDTG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than CDTG.

Price Growth

CDTG (@Environmental Services) experienced а -22.95% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +6.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-2.45% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($16.7B) has a higher market cap than CDTG($4.87M). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CDTG: GFL (272.32) vs CDTG (2.82). GFL YTD gains are higher at: 4.559 vs. CDTG (-91.124).
CDTGGFLCDTG / GFL
Capitalization4.87M16.7B0%
EBITDAN/A1.9B-
Gain YTD-91.1244.559-1,999%
P/E Ratio2.82272.321%
RevenueN/A8.08B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDTGGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IQHI26.12N/A
N/A
NYLI MacKay High Income ETF
PFH17.25-0.02
-0.12%
Prudential Financial
ZROZ66.93-0.17
-0.25%
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Trs ETF
CTEX33.83-0.14
-0.40%
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
CAPE31.47-0.20
-0.62%
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF

CDTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTG and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTG and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDTG
1D Price
Change %
CDTG100%
-15.96%
ABAT - CDTG
9%
Poorly correlated
+8.81%
LNZA - CDTG
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
GFL - CDTG
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
QRHC - CDTG
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.83%
WCN - CDTG
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More