Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CDVZX (2.65B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDVZX (1.11) vs RMEBX (1.05). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. CDVZX (6.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.63 vs. CDVZX (53.90).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 14.812 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 7.29 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 43.24 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 59.63 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.10 | 92.37 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers