Ad is loading...
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
Price$15.20
Change+$0.23 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. CDVZX (2.21B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDVZX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.18). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (17.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. CDVZX (-7.49). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. CDVZX (39.96).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.238 | -2.724 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.18 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.49 | 1.74 | -430% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.19 | 5.82 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 52.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.58 | 53.41 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...