Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CDVZX (2.64B). CDVZX (1.10) and RMEBX (1.05) have matching dividends . CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. CDVZX (3.06). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. CDVZX (41.09).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.645 | 12.462 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.05 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 5.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.23 | 27.22 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.09 | 50.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.31 | 82.68 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement