Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CDVZX (3.75B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMEBX (0.99) vs CDVZX (0.82). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). CDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. RMEBX (4.65). CDVZX (36.13) and RMEBX (34.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.881 | 8.448 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.36 | 4.65 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.91 | 34.88 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 34.68 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.89 | 92.45 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers