Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CDVZX (3.54B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMEBX (1.00) vs CDVZX (0.84). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.02 vs. RMEBX (8.70). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. CDVZX (30.73).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.533 | 9.399 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.02 | 8.70 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 35.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.73 | 36.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.37 | 90.72 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement