Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CDVZX (3.78B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMEBX (0.99) vs CDVZX (0.83). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. RMEBX (9.03). CDVZX (36.30) and RMEBX (35.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.382 | 10.367 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 9.03 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.78 | 38.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.30 | 35.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.36 | 90.55 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement