Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
Price$16.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.75B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CDVZX (2.45B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CDVZX (1.46) vs RMFCX (1.37). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. CDVZX (2.02). RMFCX (59.57) and CDVZX (56.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.915 | 3.181 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.02 | 5.25 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 20.45 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.79 | 59.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.06 | 62.18 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement