Ad is loading...
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
Price$15.20
Change+$0.23 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. CDVZX (2.21B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CDVZX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.34). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. CDVZX (-7.49). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. CDVZX (39.96).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.238 | -2.681 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.34 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.49 | 1.87 | -400% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.19 | 6.27 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 53.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.58 | 54.78 | 34% |