Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
Price$17.45
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CDVZX (2.49B). CDVZX (1.31) and RMFCX (1.27) have matching dividends . CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. CDVZX (6.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. CDVZX (57.13).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.503 | 9.596 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.27 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 11.47 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.75 | 29.27 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.13 | 61.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.23 | 79.21 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers