Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CDVZX (3.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CDVZX (0.82). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). CDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. RMFCX (4.75). CDVZX (36.13) and RMFCX (35.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.881 | 8.539 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.15 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.36 | 4.75 | 386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.91 | 35.38 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 35.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.89 | 94.16 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement