Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CDVZX (3.54B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMFCX (1.16) vs CDVZX (0.84). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.12 vs. RMFCX (8.22). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.01 vs. CDVZX (31.82).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.425 | 9.445 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.12 | 8.22 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.86 | 32.65 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.82 | 37.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.66 | 91.39 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement