Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RWEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. CDVZX (2.65B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CDVZX (1.11) vs RWEBX (0.76). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RWEBX (5.65). CDVZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.90 vs. RWEBX (50.09).
| CDVZX | RWEBX | CDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.06 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 10.329 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.76 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 5.65 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 43.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 50.09 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.10 | 76.72 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement