Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CDVZX (3.54B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CDVZX (0.84) vs RWEBX (0.76). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.12 vs. RWEBX (5.40). CDVZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.82 vs. RWEBX (24.80).
| CDVZX | RWEBX | CDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.425 | 4.570 | 359% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.76 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.12 | 5.40 | 372% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.86 | 25.01 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.82 | 24.80 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.66 | 73.09 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement