Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CDVZX (3.75B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CDVZX (0.82) vs RWEBX (0.74). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CDVZX (16 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). CDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. RWEBX (1.26). CDVZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. RWEBX (23.43).
| CDVZX | RWEBX | CDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.881 | 3.934 | 505% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.74 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.36 | 1.26 | 1,454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.91 | 27.16 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 23.43 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.89 | 75.35 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers