Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWAX vs RNWHX
CDWAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CDWAX vs RNWHX
CDWAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CDWAX (2.7B). CDWAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CDWAX (1.36) vs RNWHX (1.17). CDWAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CDWAX (13 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CDWAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CDWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). CDWAX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.87 vs. RNWHX (20.97). CDWAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.87 vs. RNWHX (17.46).
| CDWAX | RNWHX | CDWAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.72 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.72 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.625 | 15.251 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 90.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.17 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.87 | 20.97 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.44 | 48.57 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.87 | 17.46 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.32 | 106.97 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement