Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWCX vs RNWBX
CDWCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CDWCX vs RNWBX
CDWCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWCX (2.73B). CDWCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CDWCX (0.71) vs RNWBX (0.41). CDWCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CDWCX (12 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). CDWCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). CDWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). CDWCX (250) and RNWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. RNWBX (21.57). CDWCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.88 vs. RNWBX (11.57).
| CDWCX | RNWBX | CDWCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.66 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.66 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.545 | 15.181 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.86 | 21.57 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.34 | 46.18 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.88 | 11.57 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 108.53 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement