Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWCX vs RNWHX
CDWCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CDWCX vs RNWHX
CDWCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWCX (2.73B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CDWCX: RNWHX (1.14) vs CDWCX (0.71). CDWCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CDWCX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CDWCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CDWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). CDWCX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. RNWHX (22.94). CDWCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.88 vs. RNWHX (16.42).
| CDWCX | RNWHX | CDWCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.545 | 15.740 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.14 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.86 | 22.94 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.34 | 50.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.88 | 16.42 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 118.36 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement