Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWFX vs RNWBX
CDWFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CDWFX vs RNWBX
CDWFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWFX (2.73B). CDWFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CDWFX (1.86) vs RNWBX (0.41). CDWFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CDWFX (12 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CDWFX (1.21). CDWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). CDWFX (250) and RNWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.03 vs. RNWBX (22.31). CDWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. RNWBX (10.54).
| CDWFX | RNWBX | CDWFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.711 | 13.659 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.41 | 450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.03 | 22.31 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.84 | 45.06 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.83 | 10.54 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.22 | 111.96 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement