Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWFX vs RNWHX
CDWFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CDWFX vs RNWHX
CDWFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWFX (2.73B). CDWFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CDWFX (1.86) vs RNWHX (1.15). CDWFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CDWFX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CDWFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CDWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). CDWFX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.03 vs. RNWHX (23.68). CDWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. RNWHX (15.35).
| CDWFX | RNWHX | CDWFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.72 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.72 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.711 | 14.152 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.03 | 23.68 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.84 | 49.71 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.83 | 15.35 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.22 | 121.91 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement