Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs FWWNX
CEFAX vs FWWNX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs FWWNX
CEFAX vs FWWNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEFAX (167M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: CEFAX (2.36) vs FWWNX (1.21). CEFAX was incepted earlier than FWWNX: CEFAX (7 years) vs FWWNX (6 years). CEFAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: FWWNX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.63 vs. FWWNX (19.59). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.03 vs. FWWNX (15.81).
| CEFAX | FWWNX | CEFAX / FWWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.62 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.801 | 12.686 | 180% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 1.21 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.63 | 19.59 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.95 | 43.95 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.03 | 15.81 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement