Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWBX
CEKRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
Price$15.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets782.94M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.40
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
CEKRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. CEKRX (783M). CEKRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEKRX (1.28) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEKRX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEKRX (1.21). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. RNWBX (10.29). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. CEKRX (14.91).
| CEKRX | RNWBX | CEKRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.060 | 14.752 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 69.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.13 | 953% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 10.29 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.17 | 34.52 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.91 | 30.44 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.10 | 60.00 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement