Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWBX
CEKRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWBX
CEKRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEKRX (843M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than CEKRX: RNWBX (0.41) vs CEKRX (0.31). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEKRX (14 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEKRX (1.24). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.55 vs. RNWBX (18.14). CEKRX return over 5 years is better than : 11.00 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| CEKRX | RNWBX | CEKRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.759 | 12.082 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.55 | 18.14 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.29 | 39.22 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.00 | 9.30 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.30 | 97.97 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement