Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWHX
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWHX
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEKRX (843M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CEKRX: RNWHX (1.14) vs CEKRX (0.31). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEKRX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEKRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.55 vs. RNWHX (19.47). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. CEKRX (11.00).
| CEKRX | RNWHX | CEKRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.72 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.72 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.759 | 12.651 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.55 | 19.47 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.29 | 43.67 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.00 | 14.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.30 | 107.31 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement