Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs FNWFX
CEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs FNWFX
CEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. FNWFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. CEMDX (2.41B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: CEMDX (1.76) vs FNWFX (1.24). CEMDX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CEMDX (14 years) vs FNWFX (10 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CEMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: CEMDX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.02 vs. FNWFX (15.04). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 93.98 vs. FNWFX (17.91).
| CEMDX | FNWFX | CEMDX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.57 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.57 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.667 | 14.984 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 90B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.24 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.02 | 15.04 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.41 | 52.74 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.98 | 17.91 | 525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement